Effective Engineering 
                Consulting Services
                                           "Helping Engineering Excel!"

Our Premise
The Problem
Our Promise
Our Approach
Our Deliverables
Case Study
Our Results
Our People
Contact Us


Back to e-Newsletter Archives:

 Effective Engineering e-Newsletter – 11/6/2003

This is your bi-weekly e-Newsletter from Effective Engineering Consulting Services (www.effectiveeng.com).  If you would like to receive Effective Engineering e-newsletters as they are published, please send an email to e-newsletter@effectiveeng.com, and we will add you to our distribution list.


Herding Cats: The Art of “Managing” Engineers
  By Tom Dennis – President, Effective Engineering [tdennis@effectiveeng.com]

I remember a Superbowl ad that ran a few years ago that showed some cowboys on horseback riding the range trying to herd … cats.  The ad was memorable, but I’d have to say it wasn’t terribly effective because I have no recollection of what product or service they were advertising.  In any event, the cowboys were trying hard to get all of the cats moving in the same direction at the same time toward the same goal, but were having a lot of difficulty because, well, cats don’t really like to be herded.  This reminds me a lot of managers attempting to “manage” engineers.  The desired intent is there, but the results are often not what is intended or desired.  Like cats, engineers don’t want to be “herded” or “managed”.  In fact, they may simply refuse to be “managed”.  There is really an art to “managing” engineers, and if the proper approaches are not used, the results can be frustration and failure.  If the “managing” is done right, the result can be positive almost beyond comprehension.

Engineers are really different from other people.  It’s not my intent to stereotype them, so please take the following with a grain of salt, but engineers typically are highly trained, intelligent, technical, logical (Spock from StarTrek is often their “ideal”; certainly far more so than Jack Welch or Warren Buffett), and independent minded.  They are motivated by challenging work (generally far more so than by money, as long as the money is sufficient), and are resistant to being overtly managed.  They respond far more favorably to logical reasoning than to emotional manipulation.  They see beauty in the logic of their ideas, and look with disdain on hype and sizzle with little real meat behind it.  It can be difficult to properly motivate engineers, but it is very easy to de-motivate them and turn them off.

Engineers come in many different personality types, and often in surprising and complex combinations.  In this e-Newsletter I will talk in general about “managing” engineers.  In subsequent e-Newsletters I will discuss some of the different engineer personality types and ways to more effectively motivate and guide them.  In later e-Newsletters, I will put Managers (or often, more accurately, Mis-Managers) under the microscope, and address their personality types, impacts, and ways to handle them.

In most business organizations, there is a hierarchical structure, where “the boss” has control over his or her subordinates; the higher the level of the boss, the more the level of authority and control.  The Boss” controls the work, the assignments, the pay, the perks, etc., and the subordinates are expected to respect the command and authority of “the boss”.  In most situations, “the boss” has earned his or her stripes, and the subordinates bow to his or her experience and knowledge and seek to do things the way he or she says to do them.  If decisions from “the boss” are not followed, there is hell to pay.

In engineering organizations, there is a hierarchical structure in theory, but often not in reality.   The Boss” may have earned his or her stripes, but often in what are now aging or outdated technologies or disciplines, and his or her subordinates often have more current technology expertise than “the boss”.  Often, it even becomes difficult for the subordinates to even explain their “new” approach to the “old” boss.  The reality is that “the boss” does not really have the authority and respect that occurs in other organizations.  More often than not, “the boss” is more dependent on his or her subordinates than his or her subordinates are dependent on “the boss”, since the subordinates are the ones with the knowledge and expertise to make products come to life.  They are the ones who, through their intelligence, can turn complex concepts and ideas into practical, implementable products.  Thus, in reality, the engineers are really the ones with the power, and not “the boss”.

Engineers often don’t want to be troubled by such trifle notions as schedules, or revenues, or profits; typically they don’t really even understand what these are or why they’re important.  They just want to develop products that are things of creative beauty and logical perfection.  When “the boss” doesn’t “understand” this, they get upset.  They may even rebel, and say things like, “Just let me do my job and I’ll deliver the product when it’s ready”, or, “It’s impossible to invent on a schedule.  My estimate of the time it will take is just that, an estimate.  If it’s wrong, then that’s just the way it is.  Learn to live with it.

Getting engineers to do all the things management wants them to do by telling them to “just do it or there will be hell to pay” will usually backfire.  Telling them to “do it my way or it’s the highway” will turn them off and result in poor results (if the engineer even decides to stay around).  Telling them they’ve got to do their work from 8 AM to 5 PM every workday will also hit them wrong.  Instead, it is key to explain to them what needs to be done and why, in logical terms meaningful to engineers, in order to get them to buy in to what needs to be accomplished.  If they understand what’s really important and why, and agree with the logic behind the needs, they will generally go out of their way to make things happen.  You will often find engineers working all hours of the day and night to get things done that they feel are critical, but their motivation to do so will come from within, not from externally imposed demands.

Effective Managers don’t really “manage” engineers; they nurture, or guide, or convince, or encourage, or cajole, or motivate, or empathize with, or collaborate with them.  And they do this in a sincere way that shows the engineers that they are valued and appreciated.  If done right, engineers will work their hearts out, putting in enormous time, blood, sweat, and tears to make a project and product happen.  And the results can often be nothing short of astounding.

Copyright © 2003 Effective Engineering Consulting Services, All Rights Reserved

Back to e-Newsletter Archives:



Society of Professional Consultants


Copyright © 2002-2013 Effective Engineering Consulting Services, All Rights Reserved